送交者: 蓝隼 于 2011-08-05, 12:46:15:

回答: the regulation is pretty stupid. They don't seem to know 由 steven 于 2011-08-05, 12:43:23:

• Actually, for most of the commercially avaliable cell phones - steven (350 bytes) 2011-08-05, 12:58:18 (608182)
  • 好像是的，租飞机是飞行员根本不见介意我用手机，不管什么时候 - foresight (24 bytes) 2011-08-05, 14:06:46 (608234)
    • This FAA rule only applies to commercial airplanes. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-08-05, 14:25:09 (608244)
  • How can it be sure - 维尼 (110 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:08:36 (608193)
    • that is why I said no one would ever test. - steven (107 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:17:11 (608200)
      • I guess there is no strong incentive at all. - 蓝隼 (300 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:25:13 (608204)
        • some airlines offer on-flight wifi. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:26:32 (608208)
          • What is you point here? - 蓝隼 (150 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:36:26 (608215)
            • no point. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:40:38 (608223)
              • Sign... without the ONE, it is much less interesting - 蓝隼 (21 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:45:21 (608224)
    • so many type of cell phones use pre-allocated frequency. - bullrider (62 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:10:31 (608195)
      • Things get simple, in theory. - 维尼 (79 bytes) 2011-08-05, 13:14:53 (608197)

加跟贴